Anneliese Dodds MEP

The South East's Voice in Europe

Home

Latest blogs

The European Commission today announced that Apple would need to pay €13bn plus interest back to the Irish Treasury following an illegal sweetheart tax deal arranged in 1991. The deal effectively reduced Apple’s tax from the standard rate of 12.5% in Ireland to a much lower level. As this deal was specifically offered to Apple and not its competitors, the European Commission has concluded that it was illegal under state aid rules as it offered an unfair advantage in the market.

Anneliese Dodds MEP said: "Once again the EU is showing that it leads the way in the fight for tax justice.  If the Commission has found that the Irish government arranged a special sweetheart deal for Apple in the early 1990s, then it is absolutely right to call an end to this practice and demand that Apple repay the money that it has avoided in taxes for over twenty years.  

"The Tory government in the UK should take note of today's landmark decision when it approaches Brexit negotiations. Today's decision should mark a watershed moment in the fight against tax avoidance: the race to the bottom on tax must stop, and we must make sure all companies – whatever their size – are able to compete in a fair environment."

“It is important that the Commission continues to resist interference from the US Government when dealing with tax affairs in Europe. All multinationals, regardless of their country of origin, must abide by EU competition law if they wish to access the European market.”

Apple Forced to Pay Record Fee in Unpaid Tax by European Commission

The European Commission today announced that Apple would need to pay €13bn plus interest back to the Irish Treasury following an illegal sweetheart tax deal arranged in 1991. The deal...

Anneliese Dodds sent a letter to EU’s Foreign Policy Chief, Federica Mogherini, to urge her to press for Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s release from Iranian prison. 

Nazanin is a British-Iranian dual citizen, who has lived in the UK since 2007. On the 3rd April 2016, during a family visit to Iran with her two-year old daughter Gabriella, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard detained her. For the first month of her detention, Nazanin was held in solitary confinement, which has led to a deterioration of her health.
During the whole time of her imprisonment, she was not allowed to see a lawyer.
Anneliese Dodds MEP says:
“I am very worried about Nazanin’s situation. This is why I have called on the EU to take action for her immediate release. She deserves to be free and with her family.”
In her reply to Anneliese’s letter, EU’s Foreign Policy Chief Federica Mogherini states that she is “closely monitoring her [Nazanin’s] case”.
She adds that “the EU remains concerned regarding restrictions on civil liberties [in Iran] and we do hope to address these and other issues in human rights exchanges in a constructive spirit.”
Since her imprisonment, Nazanin’s husband Richard Ratcliffe, who is originally from South-East England and whose parents live in Fleet, has been campaigning tirelessly for her release.
He has set up the petition ‘Free Nazanin Ratcliffe ’ which has garnered nearly 800 000 signatures. You can sign it here.
Reacting to High Representative Federica Mogherini’s letter, Nazanin’s husband says:
"I appreciate the attention the Commission is giving to Nazanin's case and to human rights as it develops its relationship and business links with Iran.
"There is a realisation within the EU that there is a growing phenomenon in Iran of EU citizens being taken as political bargaining chips by the Revolutionary Guard. This is a threat that cuts across a number of member states and I am grateful for all that the EU can do to stand up to it."
The British Foreign office has recently updated its safety and security advice:
“There’s a risk that British nationals and British/Iranian dual nationals could be arbitrarily detained in Iran. In such cases the Foreign and Commonwealth Office has serious concerns that the subsequent judicial process falls below international standards.”

 


You can read the full text of the letter here. The letter was also signed by many other MEPs such as Anneliese’s Labour colleagues Seb Dance, Claude Moraes, Jude Kirton-Darling, Julie Ward and Neena Gill.
You can read the full text of the reply from High Representative Federica Mogherini here.

Anneliese Dodds urges EU to press for British citizen’s release from Iranian prison

Anneliese Dodds sent a letter to EU’s Foreign Policy Chief, Federica Mogherini, to urge her to press for Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s release from Iranian prison. 

Today marked the next stage of the European Parliament’s fight for tax justice: the first meeting of a new Inquiry Committee which will investigate the ‘Panama Papers’, those 11.5 million documents leaked earlier this year which showed tax avoidance taking place on a staggering scale.  I was pleased to take my seat as a member of that Committee today.

The scale of the work we are about to undertake is hard to comprehend. We are going to be investigating the largest data leak in history - a scandal that showed just how much some multinational companies and private individuals have been able to take advantage of secrecy in order to avoid paying their fair share of tax.

But I am ready for the challenge, and I know my socialist colleagues in the Parliament are too.  Fighting tax avoidance and evasion has been at the heart of our agenda for years now, and our pressure is beginning to bear fruit. Just today, European Finance Ministers adopted a new “Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive” in order to crack down on large companies taking advantage of loopholes so as to reduce their tax liability. The Ministers also discussed the possibility of creating a public list of “beneficial ownership” - who really owns what - when it comes to both companies and trust arrangements.  Finally, they took the first steps towards creating an EU-wide blacklist of tax havens.

These are all measures which I called for in a report I co-authored last year, and I am delighted to see progress being made and the EU leading the way in the global fight for tax justice.  This progress simply would not have happened without a call to action from NGOs and civil society organisations, followed up by pressure from politicians within the European Parliament.

But the fight isn’t over.  The new Panama Papers Committee’s work will begin in earnest in September, when we will get to the bottom of just how those companies and individuals got away with their tax fiddling. We still have a long way to go before we have a proper list of tax havens and are able to impose tough sanctions on those countries and the companies which use them.  Above all, we need to change the way the tax system operates, by introducing something called a  “Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base” to make sure that tax is paid in the country where it is earned, and not shipped off to tax havens for the cheapest deal.

Obviously the result of the referendum, and the UK’s decision to withdraw from the European Union, will have enormous repercussions for everything out here in Brussels and back at home.  There will need to be a new relationship forged between the UK and the EU.  Such a relationship must not involve a race to the bottom and the unravelling of all the hard-won gains we have made in the fight against tax avoidance and tax evasion. I will not stand by and watch the Tory government turn the UK into an offshore tax haven for the rest of Europe.

That is why out here in Brussels I will play an active part in the new Panama Papers Committee and make sure that we continue the European work on tax which has already started.  And it is why back in the UK I have demanded that the government establish a body that includes NGOs, academics, business and trade unions to discuss the negotiating terms for Britain’s withdrawal from the EU.  We need a new deal that works for everyone in Britain, and not just the privileged few who have the ear of Tory grandees.  That means carrying on the fight for tax justice, in Westminster and in Brussels.

 

The Panama Papers scandal exposes why we must continue to work closely with Europe on tax

Today marked the next stage of the European Parliament’s fight for tax justice: the first meeting of a new Inquiry Committee which will investigate the ‘Panama Papers’, those 11.5 million...

After the events of last Thursday, it’s safe to say that many were shocked.  

In such circumstances, it would be easy to enter a period of denial, to clamour for a second referendum or find a loophole to avoid enacting Article 50.  But the British people have made their decision and we must all respect it.

The decision to call this referendum will surely go down as one of the biggest political miscalculations in history: a prime minister calling a referendum assuming that he could only win, with no one—not even those who campaigned for it—entertaining the possibility that the country could vote to leave.

Civil servants who questioned this arrogance and attempted to draw up contingency plans were told not to in case it was leaked, despite such preparations being standard practice in a General Election.

This has led to a government that is woefully ill-prepared to argue Britain’s corner in negotiations.

We cannot leave the planning until we have a new Conservative leader – the British people, the British economy, and the 27 other countries with whom we have to negotiate all need clarity now.

It is therefore urgent that we move swiftly to establish structures necessary to create Britain’s position. We need those structures to make sure that the negotiations are effective, and that they represent the interests of a broad coalition – beyond just one party, one lobby, or one side of the referendum debate.

That is why I was so alarmed when I heard that the Business Secretary, Sajid Javid MP had called together a meeting to discuss the fallout of the referendum result, but had failed to invite any representatives from Trade Unions, civil society or our science and education sectors.

In their place were representative of the Institute of Directors, British Chambers of Commerce and those representing some of the UK’s largest Industries. This is such an overwhelmingly partial response that it can be called laughable.

While Cameron seems intent on deferring every major decision to his as-yet-unnamed successor, it seems Javid and others are seizing the opportunity to stitch up meetings behind closed doors with a highly selective group of people to determine what their highly partial view of the UK’s future should be.

This will inevitably lead to an unfair and unrepresentative relationship with the EU—and not just for those that voted Leave, but for all those that took part in the democratic process.

This is not to say that major business and industry groups should not be included, clearly, they must be. But we must not let our negotiations be dominated by business interests alone.

The shape of the post-EU UK will affect all of us and so we all need a say in what our future will look like.  

We need to establish a cross-party commission that involves not just business organisations, but also trade unions, science industries, religious groups and other civil society.

It should also involve representatives of local government and the devolved administrations, to help counter the severe divisions that have been allowed to widen in the process of this referendum.

This new approach could operate in a similar fashion to the Scottish national convention which was widely respected and sketched out the contours for the Scottish devolution settlement.

This body must also be cross-party and operate openly and transparently, ideally meeting in different parts of the country which voted in different directions on the referendum.

We must do everything we can to make this new convention or forum as inclusive as possible on the grounds of location, age, race, education and party allegiance.

We need to start now. We cannot wait three months for a new prime minister to begin setting the agenda.

We need the forum to be established to work alongside those civil servants who are already tirelessly planning a route for us to take to make sure that the future of our country delivers for everyone.

We can’t let infighting and leadership questions cloud the most important round of negotiations in generations.

 

This blog was originally featured on Left Foot Forward on 08/07/2016

The EU negotiations are about more than big business — we should all be involved

After the events of last Thursday, it’s safe to say that many were shocked.   In such circumstances, it would be easy to enter a period of denial, to clamour...

While football rivalry between England and Slovakia will be fierce this evening, many Slovak football fans watching the game tonight will be crossing their fingers for a resounding REMAIN in the UK on Thursday. The UK and Slovakia share a common interest in deepening the EU’s single market and in stability across Europe, which would be harmed should the UK decide to leave the EU.

British business has invested visibly in Slovakia following the 2004 enlargement. Many Slovaks regularly shop at Tesco’s just like their British counterparts. Last year Jaguar sealed a deal to build its new plant near the city of Nitra in western Slovakia, just as the firm expanded its operations in Wolverhampton. Many UK citizens live and work in Bratislava. If Britain leaves the EU, UK citizens and firms in Slovakia are likely to quickly encounter practical difficulties and additional costs by losing access to common rules of the single European market.

All this pales into insignificance, however, when considering the potential economic shock caused by a Brexit. As with many other aspects of life after Brexit, it is difficult to call how quickly the volatility currently starting to affect the British economy might spread to others, and the short- and long-term impact this might have.

Britain leaving the EU would also cause a headache for the Slovakian government. For the first time, Slovakia is due to hold the Council Presidency this year, from the 1st of July until the end of December- meaning that the Slovakian government will formally be the host for all meetings of EU member state governments during that time.  A Brexit is the one event that could seriously derail all the meticulous plans which have already been put in place by Slovakia for its presidency. While many of the issues the Slovakian Presidency would have to deal with will have been inherited from the previous, Dutch, Presidency, a UK decision to leave the EU would throw up a whole host of new questions and problems.

 The uncertainty caused by a Brexit would also harm progress towards energy security in the EU. This may appear an abstract issue for many Brits, but it could not be more pressing for countries like Slovakia, which literally had its gas supplies cut off in 2009 by Russia- virtually the only nation whose government has welcomed the prospect of Brexit.

If the UK decides to leave the EU, the unpicking of the EU’s links with Britain is going to be difficult, with no blueprint or precedent to go on. This situation would put many plans for Slovakia’s Council Presidency on the back burner. The scenario for the UK would be bleak, too – the remaining EU member states would fear an unravelling of the union were positive and friendly terms of exit to be negotiated.  As a result, we would expect them to play “hard ball”. It is all too easily forgotten that Britain has enjoyed a positive image in Central Europe. The UK championed EU enlargement and helped launch its so-called ‘neighbourhood policy’ to improve relations with nearby countries. During the last decade, Britain made a fundamental contribution to overcoming the divisions created by the Cold War, and ensuring peace and stability across the entire European continent. Enlargement and cooperation with EU neighbours have created investment opportunities as well as increasing security for the UK. Moreover, the UK’s influence in Slovakia and her neighbours has significantly increased because of the common use of both the English language and a pragmatic approach to policymaking in Central Europe which is similar to that common in Britain.

Regardless of its outcome, the UK referendum will affect Slovakia much more than the result of today’s football match against England. Day-to-day EU politics will not necessarily be easy if Bremain succeeds. However, it will be far more predictable and stable than in the case of a Brexit. Both Britain and Slovakia have a chance to win on 23 June, if they choose to stick together within the EU. 

 

Anneliese Dodds, Labour MEP for the South East of England

Vladimír Bilčík, Head of the EU Program at the Slovak Foreign Policy Association and Lecturer at Comenius University

 

Whatever the result, Slovakia and England both win by being in the EU

While football rivalry between England and Slovakia will be fierce this evening, many Slovak football fans watching the game tonight will be crossing their fingers for a resounding REMAIN in...


READ MORE

The Labour Party will place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better.

Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site.

To find out more about these cookies, see our privacy notice. Use of this site confirms your acceptance of these cookies.